Pandemic Inquiry

Having promised a Royal Commission into the Covid 19 pandemic, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has now abandoned his pre-election commitment.

Instead of a Royal Commission, the government has announced a three-member panel. The body comprises a retired NSW public servant, a health economist and an epidemiologist.

While their expertise will be useful to the 12-month inquiry, the panel falls far short of the promised Royal Commission.

While Health minister Mark Butler said the inquiry would be “deep and thorough”, it is clear that its ability to probe widely is heavily restricted.

The decisions of the National Cabinet are subject to the inquiry, although it has not been spelt out how cabinet confidentiality will be addressed by the panel.

Will the material presented to the National Cabinet and the deliberations of the body be subject to public scrutiny?

Indeed, it is not clear to what extent the panel will undertake its functions in public – or will aspects of the examination be conducted behind closed doors?

Significantly, the actions taken by individual states and territories will not be subject to the inquiry.

Given the fact that many of the interventions during Covid were the result of state and territory government decisions, this is a major shortcoming of the inquiry.

Some of the most egregious decisions were taken by the states and territories.

These include the closing of state borders, the detention of people in quarantine, and the lockdowns generally.

Hence the decisions of the Victorian government which resulted in hundreds of deaths are not likely to be scrutinised.

One of the panel members, Angela Jackson, was a former deputy chief-of-staff to a Labor minister. She is on record as having supported hard lockdowns in Victoria.

Jackson has already said that the panel will not be looking at lockdowns!

She is also on record for criticising people for not wearing masks in an open space playground.

The prime minister expressed hope that everyone would want to contribute to the inquiry.

This sentiment is, at best, naïve.

Premier Andrews is unlikely to fully cooperate if the actions of his government are scrutinised. Nor are his public servants, given the exposure to probable criticism.

The premier’s repeated obfuscation on a range of issues engenders little hope that the actions of his government will be scrutinised.

Nor will the inquiry examine “international programs and activities assisting foreign countries.”

The inquiry lacks the powers of a Royal Commission. It is therefore a ‘toothless tiger’ when extracting the required information to arrive at a full picture of the decision making that took place about a range of issues.

Opposition Leader Peter Dutton is correct to criticise this announcement and to suggest it is a “protection racket” for the Labor state premiers.

“The significant issue of Covid needs to be properly investigated’” said Mr Dutton. “That period of our history needs to be properly understood.”

“The prime minister owes it to the Australian people to have a proper understanding of what happened at a state and federal level in relation to Covid, the policies, the decisions that were being made.”

“If we don’t learn the lessons of what happened during the course of Covid, good and bad, by every level of government, how do we expect to go into the next pandemic not understanding what had happened in the previous one? It doesn’t make any sense.”

Mr Dutton added that “it’s clear that either the prime minister’s been rolled here by Daniel Andrews and the premier of Queensland, or the prime minister is just happy to make a mockery of his own words before the election.”

Given the panellists are technical experts in a range of fields, it is unlikely that a forensic examination of the events will occur.

The prime minister has been resisting the establishment of an inquiry for months, despite his promise.

Yet he has established numerous inquiries into a range of other issues in the 16 months his government has been in office. None of the other issues have involved the loss of life, the ongoing physical and mental issues, or the deprivation of livelihoods which resulted from decisions about Covid.

Facing ongoing criticism over a range of issues, he has decided to establish a watered-down process, hoping that the Australian people will be satisfied.

The inquiry is an insult to the intelligence of the Australian people.

First published in the Epoch Times Australia.